Study sniffs out bean - flatulence correlation

Have you ever participated in a farting contest?  Neither have I.

'cough'..

(sound of crickets..)

(sound of silence interrupted with a tiny "pip" sound flatulent)

'cough'..

Campy bathroom humour is definitely not my style.  That's so cro-mag.

A group of researchers with a penchant for discovering the truth about the urban myth that beans make you emit gaseous anomalies were farting around recently and came up with a process for teasing out whether or not people who eat beans produce more melodious gastrointestinal malfeasance than those who eat carrots or non-fart-causing soup... I wonder if one could order that soup in a restaurant.. "What will you be having today sir?"  "What's your soup du jour?" "We have three selections today, a brilliant clam chowder, an ingenious beans/ horseradish/ cabbage combo, and sans flatulensence; our non-farting soup"  "Your other soups fart?"

Server.. "pip".. looks sideways..

The concern of the research team was that peoples flatuphobia prevents them from consuming beans.  Beans are highly regarded by the worlds health authorities and daily consumption of the little (potentially) wind producing nuggets is associated with lowered cholesterol, reduction of overall chronic disease risk, and of course improved gastrointestinal function.

Flatuphobia; the highly regarded urbandictionary.com, informs us that the term initially referred to the fear of accidental bowel movements when farting (see also "shart"), but is now more associated with fear of farting in enclosed spaces such as elevators or in very quiet environments, such as a church service.

'cough'/ "pip"..

A bean walks into a GI track, "We don't digest your kind, partner.." Says the enzyme tender.

"You're going to regret that in a couple hours" says the bean.

The studies bean counters suggest why legumes may cause intestinal gas.. some of the sugars in beans are not digestible by human intestinal enzymes and are broken down by gut bacteria fermentation. Byproducts of this process include olfactory delicacies such as methane and sulphur, as well as hydrogen and carbon dioxide, which are moved out of the body in the form of flatus..

Researchers were keen to point out that there is variability of gas production between people, seemingly playing down the potential wind-farm - bean connection, adding that beans are enjoyed around the world.  Indeed people in Eastern and South African countries consume annually around 50 kg (110 lb.) of beans whereas US residence dine on a mere 7 lb. of the party pleasers.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the perception of flatulence and GI discomfort among those eating 1/2 a cup of beans daily (1).

Study subjects were fed beans and enclosed in an elevator or quiet church service for 12 weeks.  OK that's not totally true, only partially true.  The part about 12 weeks was true.

Perception of flatulence.  Are people unclear as to whether or not they let one rip?  About that elevator thing.. Maybe the researchers are onto something here because when it's totally obvious someone has abused their social contract privileges and sneaked a cheek with a silent but deadly in an elevator, everyone looks around with a disdained accusatory gaze while simultaneously claiming innocence.  Two men say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong.

If Jesus farted in an elevator would it be heavenly?  "And let it be said that the Son of God did cause a ruffle in his robe and his disciples were lulled with lavender" .. Luke 1:20:19

The study was well designed with randomized crossover trials.  Some participants ate beans and some ate carrots or the previously mentioned special soup du jour, then the groups switched.  The outcome?

Once the smoke cleared less than 50% of people reported increased flatulence from eating pinto or baked beans, and only a 19% increase with black-eyed peas.  Which reminds me of the Black Eyed Peas performance at the 2011 Superbowl.. not their best performance, they stunk out the joint..

3-11% of all study participants, even those on control diets reported increased flatulence.

"Peoples concerns about excess flatulence from eating beans may be exaggerated".  That's a verbatim quote from the study conclusions, I didn't doctor that one..

The caveat? "It is important to recognize there is individual variation in response to different bean types".

Rinsing beans during the preparation process removes a lot of the sugars that cause the colon kerfuffle, so although this study claims that there's nothing to worry about.. ("nothing to smell here people, keep moving"), if you want to further decrease the less than 50% chance that you'll succumb to intestinal sugar sorcery, rinse your beans if canned, and after the soak and also after being cooked if you're using dried beans.

Experiment with different beans to see what your individual response may be, which may be best done alone if you suffer flatuphobia, otherwise churches and elevators appear to be the favoured testing grounds.

I've got some beans soaking now..

"Pip"

References:

(1) Nutrition Journal | Full text | Perceptions of flatulence from bean consumption among adults in 3 feeding studies

(2) I strongly suggest investigating this historic account of.. well.. just check it out..

(3) more background investigation 

Big Breakfast For Weight Loss?

A new study (1) seems to show that eating chocolate cake for the purpose of adding extra calories at breakfast increases total weight loss over 32 weeks compared to consuming the same total calories over a day, but not loading up at breakfast.

I love chocolate cake.  In fact I love just about anything that is chocolate.  Except chocolates filled with caramel.. or mint flavoured chocolate.. and I'm not really into milk chocolate.  OK so I have specific tastes for chocolate; my favorite is anything between 70 and 90% dark chocolate.

I love putting a tablespoon of dark chocolate cocoa into my yogurt.  Maybe two tablespoons.  Yes, definitely two tablespoons.  If I ate a piece of chocolate cake along with my breakfast every morning should I expect to lose fat?  Is that what this study is saying?

Not really.  This study looked at 193 obese men and woman in their late 40's/ early 50's over a 32 week period where their total calories consumed for the day was limited to 1600 calories (men) and 1400 calories (woman).   Everyone in their respective groups was to consume the same total calories over a day, with an intervention group shuffling a little more of those calories to breakfast in the form of a chocolate dessert.

They wanted to discover whether or not eating extra calories in the morning from sweets would influence food cravings later in the day.  It did, but it took a while.  In the first 16 weeks the morning desert eaters lost the same amount of weight as the straight laced eaters, about 33 pounds.  By the time 32 weeks of chocolate breakfast bliss had passed, those not given the self indulgent sweet tooth option gave into cravings, fell of the calorie reduced wagon, and regained 22 pounds of prime real-estate back onto their bodies.  The unabashed dessert dieters lost an additional 15 pounds.

The scientists were also looking at ghrelin levels after breakfast.  The diet with more carbs and protein from the dessert released less ghrelin than those on the lower calorie breakfast.  "Satiety was significantly improved and hunger and craving scores significantly reduced in the.. breakfast + dessert group versus breakfast only group", the study reports.  Ghrelin is a hormone that makes us feel hungry and is produced in the gut.

Another study showed that a bigger breakfast simply added more calories to the total for the day and did not help weight loss (2).

The main difference between these studies? The dessert at breakfast study, which sounds great, had all study subjects placed on a long term calorie reduced diet and observed the ability to stay on such a diet.  The second study looked those voluntarily consuming large breakfasts while not a diet.

In the second study obese subjects who ate more at breakfast simply introduced more calories to their day as they did not tend to eat less than usual following breakfast.

The first study's researchers recommend considering eating more of your total calories for the day at breakfast when on a calorie reduced diet for weight loss.

The second study's team says if you want to lose weight reduce your calories at breakfast so at least you're reducing calories somewhere, which will help reducing total calories consumed over the day.

I say forget about both these studies as neither of them looked at the important weight loss strategy of mindfulness about what we eat and making changes in how we think about the rewards we associate with overeating.  These studies also did not include regular exercise.

When you're comparing red Pinto's to brown Pinto's, you're still comparing the same crappy car.  While it's interesting to look at the different ways the Pinto is crappy, why not look why a Lexus is good, and then go about emulating those qualities?

Studies like this are interesting to a degree, but when the most relevant, and already known successful weight loss strategies are not discussed in the conclusion, or used as a control in the study, we get good science, but poor conclusions.  How can that be "good science"?  We're still discovering what occurs under the conditions studied so our overall understanding increases.  But in both these cases the outcome recommendations are not relevant to an overall long term successful weight loss strategy because the recommendations are myopic: restricted only to the limited scope of the study.

What does the first study really show?  No matter what we eat, or when we eat it, if we eat fewer calories than we consume, we will lose fat, and if we don't work on the source of cravings for overeating, we'll succumb to them.

How about the second study?  No matter when we eat more, breakfast or any other time, if we overeat we'll gain weight.

It feels great to feel released from the habit of overeating by learning to eat healthy and feel good about it.

Let's get out there and feel good about exercise and making healthy food choices.

(1) Meal timing and composition influence ghrelin levels, appetite scores and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults 10.1016/j.steroids.2011.12.006 : Steroids | ScienceDirect.com

(2) Nutrition Journal | Full text | Impact of breakfast on daily energy intake - an analysis of absolute versus relative breakfast calories

Urban Athletes

These are some of the greatest athletes in the world, but they're not going for gold medals.

CBC.ca Player